Item | Wt (lbs) | Moment Arm |
Canopy | 15 | -58 |
Fwd Fuselage | 50 | -37 |
Instruments | 10 | -69 |
Fwd Sight | 3 | -122 |
Wing Sight | 3 | -30 |
Landing Gear | 35 | -24 |
BRS | 28 | -24 |
Control Systems | 15 | 0 |
Ventral Fins (2) | 18 | -6 |
Duct | 85 | 16 |
Wings & Ailerons | 90 | -3 |
Stators | 32 | 33 |
Fwd Engine | 155 | -4 |
Aft Engine | 155 | 33 |
Propellers (2) | 60 | 14 |
Prop. Axle and Bearings | 12 | 14 |
Aft Fuselage | 30 | 64 |
Tail Surfaces and Wheel | 40 | 107 |
Batteries | 25 | -85 |
Electrical | 6 | -25 |
Empty Weight | 867 lbs | @ FS 6.96 |
A 170 lb pilot with full sump tanks will put the flying weight at 1097 lb and the CG at FS -2.55approximately correct for the present planform. (Note: A comprehensive CFD analysis will be required to pin down the optimal CG location.) The aircrafts light weight, combined with the forward location of the pilot seat, makes the aircraft sensitive to pilot weight. Nose ballast will be necessary for light pilots, and possibly tail ballast for heavy ones. For more permanent CG adjustments the batteries can be moved aft from their present locations in the nose. These numbers will undoubtedly change as detail design proceeds. The intention here is to illustrate that the light engines and self-bracing structure provide an opportunity for a very light airplane, and that CG concerns have been addressed.
|
||
© Copyright 1992-2009 Philip Carter
|